journal_logo

GMS Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e.V. (GMDS)

1860-9171


Der Volltext dieses Artikels liegt nur in englischer Sprache vor.
Research Article
EFMI STC 2025

[Entwicklung einer kollaborativen digitalen Plattform für Zweitmeinungen bei seltenen Erkrankungen: Integration von KI und Gesundheitsnetzwerken für eine verbesserte Versorgung]

 Vinícius Lima 1,2
Filipe Bernardi 1,2
Victor Ferraz 1
Domingos Alves 1

1 Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Brazil
2 RISE-Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Portugal

Zusammenfassung

Die RD2O-Plattform ist eine digitale Lösung, die zur Unterstützung von Zweitmeinungen in der Versorgung bei seltenen Erkrankungen entwickelt wurde, insbesondere in Gesundheitssystemen, die durch regionale Ungleichheiten gekennzeichnet sind, wie beispielsweise in Brasilien. RD2O wurde im Rahmen von Aktionsforschung entwickelt und basiert auf einem soziotechnischen Ansatz. Die Plattform verbindet Allgemeinmediziner, Fachärzte und Patientenverbände über ein sicheres Webportal. Über die Plattform können klinische und nicht-klinische Anfragen eingereicht werden, die durch generative KI-Modelle unterstützt und von menschlichen Experten validiert werden. Vorläufige Bewertungen zeigen, dass RD2O komplexe Falldiskussionen vereinfacht, die Genauigkeit von Zweitmeinungen verbessert und zu einer wachsenden, öffentlich zugänglichen Bildungsdatenbank beiträgt. Seine modulare Architektur integriert klinische Leitlinien, Datenschutzprotokolle und Telehealth-Anwendungen, wodurch es skalierbar und an andere nationale Kontexte anpassbar ist. RD2O gewährleistet eine ethische, nutzerzentrierte und evidenzbasierte digitale Transformation im Gesundheitswesen, indem es Bewertungsmechanismen in jede Entwicklungsphase einbettet. Diese Plattform veranschaulicht, wie kollaborative, KI-gestützte Systeme die Versorgung seltener Krankheiten stärken, die öffentliche Politik beeinflussen und validiertes Wissen durch einen sicheren, überprüfbaren Prozess generieren können.


Schlüsselwörter

seltene Krankheiten, Zweitmeinung, digitale Gesundheit, generative KI

Introduction

Rare diseases (RDs) affect a small fraction of the population individually but collectively represent a significant global public health concern. With over 7,000 recognized rare diseases, most of them complex and chronically debilitating, patients often endure lengthy diagnostic odysseys, inappropriate treatments, and considerable emotional and financial burdens [1]. In countries like Brazil, the situation is further complicated by stark regional disparities in healthcare access and the distribution of medical specialists [2].

Second opinions from specialized professionals are often critical to improving diagnostic precision, ensuring appropriate therapeutic approaches, and reducing the risk of unnecessary or harmful interventions [3].

This paper presents the Rare Disease Second Opinion (RD2O) platform, an evidence-based digital initiative developed in Brazil to support the delivery of second opinions for patients with rare diseases. Inspired by international models such as the Clinical Patient Management System (CPMS) [4], and EURACAN [5], RD2O brings an inclusive approach anchored in Brazil’s legal frameworks.

Methods

The RD2O platform was conceived using the action research methodology [6], which allows for continuous co-construction of knowledge and solution refinement in real-world contexts. This iterative and participatory process involved diverse stakeholders, including physicians, healthcare administrators, IT professionals, and researchers. The platform is under development in the Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto, supported by the Brazilian National Rare Disease Network (RARAS) and the National Institute of Rare Diseases (INCT).

Stakeholder engagement was a central component of the design process. Multiple interactions were conducted to refine features and identify potential barriers to adoption. Healthcare professionals contributed insights into practical challenges, including the standardization of medical records and the need for context-specific clinical guidelines. Platform development was structured into the following phases:

  1. Theoretical and empirical groundwork based on national and international experiences, including the Formative Second Opinion from the Brazilian Telehealth Program [7];
  2. Mapping user needs, legal requirements, and system limitations;
  3. Solution modeling using Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) to define clinical workflows, content approval hierarchies, and user roles; and
  4. System database modeling, designing of interactive prototypes with FIGMA, and iterative testing.

The technical architecture combines Python with MySQL and MongoDB to handle relational and document-based data. Generative AI models (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, and Llama) will automate drafts of responses and streamline query processing. Human experts review all AI-generated outputs to ensure clinical rigor.

Preliminary results

Preliminary results from the first phase demonstrate the platform’s potential to streamline the process of obtaining second opinions for cases involving rare diseases. The RD2O web portal is proposed as a centralized access point. Through this interface, users will be able to:

  1. submit detailed clinical cases for expert group discussion;
  2. submit non-clinical or administrative queries (e.g., disease classification, guideline development, or policy alignment); and
  3. access a public knowledge database of previously validated second opinions and clinical insights.

Figure 1 [Fig. 1] presents the platform overview.

Figure 1: RD2O platform overview. Outputs include structured case discussions, technical Q&A, and anonymized expert reports, all searchable via a public educational portal.

Each query submitted will be processed through the RD2O Admin System, where it will be classified and routed to the appropriate reviewers. AI models will support this process by generating draft responses or literature summaries, thereby reducing turnaround times. Case discussions and documentation will contribute to a continuously growing educational database, supporting the dissemination of knowledge. An AI audit trail is embedded to assess model reliability and track concordance between human expert responses and AI-generated content. Metrics for validation include time-to-response, clinical relevance scoring, and usability feedback from pilot users.

Final considerations

The development of the RD2O platform represents a pivotal step in improving the management and care of rare diseases in Brazil. The platform supports healthcare professionals with practical, validated insights and fosters a culture of continuous learning through its educational database. The modular architecture may support interoperability with national systems. Sustainability is addressed through key partnerships (RARAS, INCT) and engagement in public policy.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) supports this project (grant no. 2023/10203-8 and 2024/22679-0).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


References

[1] Marwaha S, Knowles JW, Ashley EA. A guide for the diagnosis of rare and undiagnosed disease: beyond the exome. Genome Med. 2022 Feb 28;14(1):23. DOI: 10.1186/s13073-022-01026-w
[2] Machado CV, Silva GAE. Political struggles for a universal health system in Brazil: successes and limits in the reduction of inequalities. Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):77. DOI: 10.1186/s12992-019-0523-5
[3] Hayeems RZ, Michaels-Igbokwe C, Venkataramanan V, Hartley T, Acker M, Gillespie M, Ungar WJ, Mendoza-Londona R, Bernier FP, Boycott KM, Marshall DA. The complexity of diagnosing rare disease: An organizing framework for outcomes research and health economics based on real-world evidence. Genet Med. 2022 Mar;24(3):694-702. DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.005
[4] Mönig I, Steenvoorden D, de Graaf JP, Ahmed SF, Taruscio D, Beun JG, Johannsen TH, Juul A, Hiort O, Pereira AM. CPMS-improving patient care in Europe via virtual case discussions. Endocrine. 2021 Mar;71(3):549-54. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-021-02628-x
[5] Blay JY, Casali P, Ray-Coquard I, Seckl MJ, Gietema J, de Herder WW, Caplin M, Klümpen HJ, Glehen O, Wyrwicz L, Peeters R, Licitra L, Girard N, Piperno-Neumann S, Kapiteijn E, Idbaih A, Franceschi E, Trama A, Frezza AM, Hohenberger P, Hindi N, Martin-Broto J, Schell J, Rogasik M, Lejeune S, Oliver K, de Lorenzo F, Weinman A. Management of patients with rare adult solid cancers: objectives and evaluation of European reference networks (ERN) EURACAN. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Feb 16;39:100861. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100861
[6] Greenwood DJ, Levin M. Introduction to Action Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2006.
[7] Haddad AE, Skelton-Macedo MC, Abdala V, Bavaresco C, Mengehel D, Abdala CG, Harzheim E. Formative second opinion: qualifying health professionals for the unified health system through the Brazilian Telehealth Program. Telemed J E Health. 2015 Feb;21(2):138-42. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0001